Category Archives: Family Law

What will happen to my claim over the marital home, should I leave the home prior to getting a divorce?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
What will happen to my claim over the marital home, should I leave the home prior to getting a divorce?

Question: What will happen to my claim over the marital home, should I leave the home prior to getting a divorce?

Answer: Generally your claim over the matrimonial home is not affected by your decision to leave the home. However, people can live in the same home and still be separated so long as they are living separated lives in this environment. It is often important to remain in the matrimonial home for a variety of reasons.  These include but are not limited to maintaining a relationship with your children, maintaining the residence, and maintaining your financial stability and minimizing expenditures.  On the other hand, it may be worthwhile to leave the matrimonial home if you can afford it, as it often relieves tension between the parties.  If you leave the matrimonial home, this will not impact on your rights and entitlements to share in the assets.  This decision can affect your relationship with your children and what the results may be for custody.

Provided that you are a joint owner of a property or defined as a spouse under the Family Law Act, you can apply for exclusive occupation of the matrimonial residence and use of the contents.  A spouse is somebody who is married or has been living with the other party for a period of at least 2 years in a continuous relationship who is not married.

The residence at issue can be owned or leased by one of the parties or both parties.  It is not guaranteed that a person will receive exclusive occupancy.  The person applying for exclusive occupancy will have to establish that shared use of the home is a practical impossibility and that the applicant is on balance the preferred occupant.

What is a parenting coordinator?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
What is a parenting coordinator?

Question: What is a parenting coordinator?

Answer: The Family Law Act allows for guardians to agree or the court to order that a qualified professional be appointed to assist guardians in implementing aspects of their parenting plan and making agreed to or ordered decisions about the plan. The agreement or order is generally limited to two years and the decisions of the co-ordinator are binding unless a guardian can establish the decision did not consider material evidence or fails to apply the law. Care should be taken on agreeing to such a process as often co-ordinators are busy and hard to see in a timely way and once they make a decision you may likely be stuck with one you don’t agree with, with limited court review. On the other hand for people with limited resources and communication issues the co-ordinator approach can be an efficient way to resolve parenting issues.

What is collaborative law?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
What is collaborative law?

Question: What is collaborative law?

Answer: Collaborative law is a process whereby parties focus in on getting a negotiated settlement and each have their own lawyer but the understanding is that each lawyer is focused on reaching a settlement and cannot act further for the parties if proceedings do not result in a settlement and the parties have to go to court.  In the collaborative process, the lawyers may engage another lawyer to mediate and may engage experts as required like valuators for land or other property or a counsellor or psychologist to deal with custody issues.  Routinely, the parties share the costs of these expenses with the focus being to avoid court proceedings.

What is arbitration?

Date
Posted by
Comments0

Question: What is arbitration?

Answer: Arbitration is a process whereby the two parties to a family law dispute agree that they need a third party to resolve an issue between them but wish to note go to court and will hire a third party (usually a senior lawyer or retired judge) to decide the issue for them. The advantage of this approach is that two parties to a family law dispute can usually get to an arbitrator faster than going to court and subject to the direction by an arbitrator can tailor the evidence they will call to their specific needs. Often parties will attend with their own counsel and arbitration is often effective where there are a few discrete issues to resolve.

Upon Separation What are My Entitlements to Assets?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
Upon Separation What are My Entitlements to Assets?

Question: Upon Separation What are My Entitlements to Assets?

Answer: In British Columbia, there is not as big a distinction in the law as it applies to married and unmarried couples and same sex partners.  Subject to a written agreement to the contrary in the proper form known as a Family Law Agreement, married couples, including those of the same sex and hetro-sexual spouses, are entitled to share in 50% of the value of all family assets as determined by the Family Law Act.

For those who are co-habitating and not married or are co-habitating in a same sex relationship they have the same rights as if they were married spouses if they have been living together for at least two years before they separate. For others not within these definitions there is no Statute, which guarantees any entitlement to them.  Instead, they must rely on the concept of common law gift and trust claims to assert and prove an entitlement.  There is no guarantee they can do this easily.

Unlike other provinces in Canada, British Columbia has what is known as an in rem property system or one that gives each party (referring to married people of the same sex) an entitlement as a family property asset to a ½ interest in every property they own or in which they have a beneficial interest (someone else is the registered owner but is holding the equity for the spouse) in their name or their spouses name or to which their spouse is beneficially entitled on the date the parties separate which is not defined to be an excluded asset by the act. With regard to excluded property spouses will share equally any increase in value of the excluded property. If there is no increase in the value of excluded property there is nothing to share. The onus of proving an asset is excluded is on the spouses stating this. Also if equity is received by a spouse from something which would have been a family asset is placed in another asset which would be excluded that asset becomes a family asset upon separation.

An important note if you are unmarried and in a common law relationship your entitlement to make a claim to family assets is limited to two years from the date of separation and two years from the date of divorce if you were married. Therefore, you should act quickly upon separation to contact a family lawyer like the ones at Dubas and Company to pursue your claims and understand what they can be.

 

Is a separation better than going to court?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
Is a separation better than going to court?

Question: Is a separation agreement better than going to court?

Answer: In British Columbia parties have a choice of whether or not they go to Supreme Court or Provincial Court with respect to some issues. If parties are not seeking a divorce and simply want to deal with the issues of custody, access and support, they can proceed in Provincial Court. Some people believe this can be more cost effective as there are no filing fees and they can make use of family law mediators from the government free of charge. As with all mediation however, people should be aware of their rights before attending a family law mediator in Provincial Court because once they have agreed to an Order or filed an Agreement in Provincial Court, it will likely be impossible to have it reviewed.

The Supreme Court of British Columbia is the only court in the province, which can deal with divorce and asset division. It also has jurisdiction to deal with custody and access matters, child support and spousal support under both the Family Relations Act and the Divorce Act. As well, it is often the better forum because document disclosure is required pursuant to the Rules of Court in a much broader way than in Provincial Court and other discovery mechanisms are available in Supreme Court and not Provincial Court. Further, if there is property at issue or a divorce at issue, because the Provincial Court cannot deal with these matters, if you commence an application in Provincial Court you may find that later on you have to commence an action in Supreme Court to deal with assets or a divorce, which can lead to having to fund two law suits on the same matter.

In the Provincial Court, it is mandatory to go to mediation through the court mediator prior to having an application heard. Similarly in Supreme Court, except for very limited Orders, it is required to go to a Judicial Case Conference prior to setting any applications for hearing. At the Judicial Case Conference a judge of the court presides and parties attend with their lawyers to discuss the case. The judge will provide some input as to what they think is a reasonable outcome and may assists the parties in coming to settlement. The process is informal and is off the record. This means that nothing said at the Judicial Case Conference can be used in court in the future. By consent of the parties at very little expense, the judge at the Judicial Case Conference can make any Order temporarily or final that the parties agree to. Further, the judge can make procedural directions to ensure the court process proceeds in a proper way. This can involve things like setting a trial date, granting orders regarding document disclosure and setting down times when things in the process will be accomplished by the parties like when various applications will be heard. The choice of forum is important and counsel should be consulted before you decide where to start your case. You must also bear in mind that even if you start a case in court you can still resolve it at any time with the assistance of counsel or on your own if you do not have counsel. Many court procedures like the Judicial Case Conference are set up to promote settlement because the judges themselves see the value to a settlement process, which weeds out cases that can be resolved and stream lines those cases which remain.

Should I get a prenuptial agreement (family law agreement)?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
Should I get a prenuptial agreement (family law agreement)?

Question: Do I need a prenuptial agreement before I get married?

Answer: For people who qualify as spouses under the Family Law Act  because they are married or have  cohabitated in a marriage like relationship upon separation there is a presumption that each party will have a 50% interest in all family property in the name of the other party and in their name. This is subject to a Family Law Agreement to the contrary.

A Family Law Agreement is an agreement between two people who are about to enter into a marriage like relationship where they anticipate becoming spouses or have acquired, for the purpose of dividing assets or pensions under the Family Law Act, the status of spouses which agreement these two people wish to be determinative of the division of their assets and debts. upon separation instead of the provisions of the Family Law Act. These agreements can also determine, if the parties wish it, how spousal support will be determined or whether or not a spouse can apply for support. The agreement is signed by both spouses and at least one party witnessing their signature. It is almost always better to have an agreement if you are contemplating living with another person to establish what will occur if your relationship does not work out. In this way you can ensure certainty and avoid costly litigation when a relationship ends. Under the new Family Law Act agreements are encouraged more than ever before and if properly negotiated and drafted will almost always be upheld by the court. They are now definitely the way to go if possible.

Historically if these agreements were entered into prior to the commencement of a relationship they were referred to as pre-nuptial or ante-nuptial agreements and if they arose during cohabitation they were referred to as cohabitation agreements. If they occurred after separation they were referred to as separation agreements. These distinctions and names are not any longer that important under the new act because all such agreements which are in writing and witnessed by at least one person and finally divide assets between spouses or potential spouses are defined to be Family Law Agreements.

How quickly can I get a divorce?

Date
Posted by
Comments0
How quickly can I get a divorce?

Question: How quickly can I get a divorce?

Answer: If you have no children and there are no disputes about asset division, you can usually obtain a divorce in British Columbia within three to four months. It will take longer if the other person resides in the United States or outside North America. These types of “uncontested divorces” are handled without court appearances and we can prepare the documents on your behalf. Usually this will require only one or two meetings with us.